The Ottumwa Courier

Court Calls

May 29, 2013

A different kind of cyber threat

The reality is, that in our country’s culture, people depend on electronic devices. For many, it’s become a 24/7 relationship. Sometimes I wonder where it will lead us, and if coming generations will be born with advanced dexterities to instinctively operate smart phones. Just watch the teenagers to see how fast the thumbs can move.

Technology enhances our lives exponentially from what we imagined even just a decade ago; yet, the prevalence and mobility of electronics presents us with profound dangers. Physical threats are well publicized — such as the perils of drivers who text or the enabled access predators have to potential victims. Many parents know well the psychological risks also posed — such as youngsters’ unhealthy obsession with online relationships.

Even the court system has to be on guard. Every judge experiences interruption by someone’s ringing cell phone that temporarily halts somber proceedings. But the creep of unapproved technology into court functions is more sinister than that because it can operate to undermine the very fabric of justice.

Last week in an Appanoose County jury trial, I gave what-have-become standard instructions to jurors:

“ ... Until you have reached a verdict, you may not communicate about this case outside the jury room, [including] via cell phones, and any form of electronic media such as text messages, Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, YouTube, Twitter, email, etc.

“ Do not [investigate] this case on your own. Do not visit or view any place discussed in this case, and do not use Internet maps or Google Earth or any other program or device to search for or to view any place discussed in the testimony. Also, do not research any information about this case, the law, or the people involved, including the parties, the witnesses, the lawyers, or the judge ...

“ This case must be tried on evidence presented in the courtroom. If you conduct independent research ... your verdict may be influenced by inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading information that has not been tested by the trial process — including the oath to tell the truth and cross-examination. All of the parties are entitled to a fair trial rendered by an impartial jury, and you must conduct yourself so as to maintain the integrity of the trial process. If you decide a case based on information not presented in court, you will have denied the parties a fair trial in accordance with the rules of this state, and you will have done an injustice.”

It’s a brave new world in the justice system.

Judge Scieszinski lives in Albia and has served the 8th Judicial District for 17 years as a trial judge. She may be reached at

Text Only
Court Calls
  • 0824 Court Calls photo Scieszinski -M -T The reach of sociology Every year Iowa judges are invited to speak in local schools, on college campuses and at civic events to help the community understand the role of the courts in daily life. An interesting trend on my circuit of judicial outreach is the demand for pre

    August 23, 2013 1 Photo

  • Good news By Chief Judge Mary Ann Brown The Iowa Judicial Branch dedicates itself to providing independent and accessible forums for the fair and prompt resolution of disputes, administering justice under law equally to all people. -- Iowa Judicial Branch Mis

    July 27, 2013

  • 0622 OTT Opinion Judge Lucy Gamon photo -T -L The judge as gatekeeper when the goal is justice "… no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Constitution of the United States, Amendment 4 It is 2 a.m. on a dar

    June 22, 2013 1 Photo

  • 0608 OTT Judge Joel Yates photo -L Who was James Otis? Most Americans can associate some names with our country's fight for independence from the English Monarchy, which began in earnest in 1775: Washington, Jefferson, Franklin and Adams. Few, if any, would credit James Otis. Here is why they should. It

    June 8, 2013 1 Photo

  • 0529 OTT Opinion Judge Annette Scieszinski photo A different kind of cyber threat The reality is, that in our country's culture, people depend on electronic devices. For many, it's become a 24/7 relationship. Sometimes I wonder where it will lead us, and if coming generations will be born with advanced dexterities to instinctively

    May 29, 2013 1 Photo

  • 0511 OTT Opinion Judge Myron Gookin -T -M We never really graduate It's May, and the graduation announcements are rolling in. It's a wonderful time to celebrate the educational achievements of those who are graduating from various schools. It did not take me long, however, to realize that learning does not end with

    May 11, 2013 1 Photo

  • 0425 Opinion Judge Mary Ann Brown photo -L Spring brings magistrate commissions Hopefully, spring color will soon be here. It seems like it's been a long time coming. This spring also brings with it the process associated with selecting judicial magistrates. Local commissions have begun the process of taking applications, interv

    April 25, 2013 1 Photo

  • The kind of judge I will be

    April 6, 2013

  • Selecting a new judge

    March 16, 2013

  • Symbolism and functionality

    March 2, 2013

AP National