subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Sun, Nov 08 2009 

Resources

print this story   Print this story
  Post to del.icio.us

Published June 23, 2008 10:44 am -

Prosecutors say evidence didn’t violate Bentler’s rights
Clothing was lawfully seized

By AMY LORENTZEN, Associated Press Writer

DES MOINES (AP) — Prosecutors have filed their arguments in the appeal by a man convicted of fatally shooting his parents and three teenage sisters.

Shawn Bentler was convicted of five counts of first-degree murder in May 2007 and is serving five life sentences. Authorities said he drove from his home in Quincy, Ill., in October 2006 and murdered his family in their rural Bonaparte home in southeastern Iowa.

Bentler is appealing his case to the Iowa Supreme Court. He asks the high court to reverse the conviction and sentence and send the case back to district court for a new trial.

Bentler’s lawyer filed his arguments in the case earlier this week. In the brief, Bentler claims a district court judge should not have allowed the clothing he was wearing when he was arrested to be used as evidence at his trial.

A key piece of the prosecution’s evidence was a pair of socks he was wearing when he was arrested. On them was a drop of his mother’s blood placing him at the scene of the murders.

Bentler argues in his appeal that the seizure and initial examination of his clothing violated his constitutional rights. That’s because investigators with the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation didn’t have a warrant to take the clothes from the custody of the Adams County, Illinois, jail, he claims.

In arguments filed on Friday, prosecutors said Bentler’s clothing was lawfully seized.

“Once his clothes were lawfully in the possession of police, defendant no longer had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his clothes and they lawfully could be released to Iowa agents for examination and testing,” prosecutors said.

Even if the clothing was unlawfully seized, prosecutors said the agents later obtained a search warrant so “the taint of any illegality was purged.”

“Finally, even if the district court erred in denying Bentler’s suppression motion, any error would be harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of Bentler’s guilt,” prosecutors argued.



print this story    email this story   






autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Employment Opportunities

PLACE YOUR JOB OPENINGS HERE!!!!
Double the effectiveness of your advertising dollar by placing your job opportunities on www.ottumwa.com.

W
...>MORE

See all ads


Today's Front Page

Subscribe to XML Feeds

 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index