Content Exchange

DES MOINES — The state of Iowa spent about $12.3 billion in federal funds in fiscal 2020, according to a single audit issued Monday by State Auditor Rob Sand, that represented about a $3 billion increase – much of which was tied to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

Sand said about $2.3 billion of the 32.7 percent spike in federal aid the state received during the 2020 fiscal year came from the CARES Act, while changes in non-CARES and non-loan programs included an increase of about $518 million in funding for Medicaid expenditures in the 96-page report.

Expenditures directly related to the CARES programs included $1.4 billion in additional unemployment insurance, $605 million from the Coronavirus Relief Fund, $97 million for the Educational Stabilization Fund program and $56 million in CARES-related supplemental School breakfast and lunch programs, according to the single audit released Monday.

Expenditures for programs not related to CARES included about $4 billion for Medicaid, $1.4 billion in capitalization grants for clean water state revolving funds, $598.8 million for highway planning and construction, $491.6 million for unemployment insurance and $482.7 million for capitalization grants for drinking water state revolving funds, according to the report.

While state officials administered about 600 federal programs during the year ended June 30, 2020, a total of five programs accounted for about 70 percent of total federal expenditures not related to CARES funding.

In his audit, the Democratic state auditor reported nine internal control deficiencies and three instances of noncompliance at various state agencies within Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds’ administration – including $448,449 in unsupported salaries paid within the governor’s office from the Coronavirus Relief Fund.

According to Sand’s report, the control deficiencies he cited address issues such as lack of policies and procedures to ensure variances are identified and corrected, ways various reports are reviewed and approved -- including all the proper information submitted to the federal government prior to the due date, and ensuring all required information is included.

In addition, he said there were three non-compliance findings addressing questioned costs of $113,813 paid to incarcerated individuals, $124,698 in payments to deceased individuals for Unemployment Insurance and the $448,449 in unsupported salaries paid from the Coronavirus Relief Fund. He provided the state agencies with recommendations to address each of the findings.

“The governor had a budget shortfall, she had too many people on her personal staff and didn’t have a big enough money to pay them all so instead of addressing either the budget that she had or the number of staff she had, she decided to use CARES Act money instead,” Sand said in an interview.

“We warned her back in October that it would be difficult for having her office’s salaries qualify as a CARES Act usage and gave her specific directions how to make it most likely to qualify,” Sand added, noting that requests for documentation were not provided and he expected federal overseers may request that some of the federal money not used for pandemic-related functions may have to be returned.

The governor’s office did not respond to a request for comment on the state auditor’s findings.

A copy of the report is available at

This article originally ran on


Trending Video Content Exchange

Recommended for you